The image for the 21st Century!

On the throne: Emmanuel Macron in Paris shortly after his inauguration. Photograph: Charles Platiau/AFP/Getty

Could this be one of the most important pictures for the 21st Century?

I think it might be. So, let me offer my reasoning and see if you either agree or disagree. ok?

This may be a lengthy article so please bear with me.

First of all, my perceived declaration of my thoughts. What we are seeing here are the two thrones or the two legs of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream image.

We know from Scripture that there will be TWO LEADERS during the 7 year tribulation period. One will be Emmanuel Macron and the other will be the Pope. One is secular and the other is religious. And they don’t mix. I suppose the Roman Catholic Church was the last to try this with their Popes who were also the civil rulers.

Scripture tells us that:

Daniel 2:41-43 …’And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters’ clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay. And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken?. And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.’

But, if I am correct, we will see a ROMAN POPE sharing power with a Revived ROMAN EMPEROR named Emmanuel Macron. a RELIGIOUS LEADER sharing power with a CIVIL LEADER. Part Iron… Part Clay, with the Civil leader eventually over-powering the religious leg. We see this in scripture when the Anti Christ declares himself to be GOD! There will be no need at that time for another religious head of state. The antichrist fully possessed by the Devil Himself will be able to handle both jobs.

Now, if you will allow me, I would like to tie in an old but very relevant study I did about the Two Witnesses.
At that time, some of the reasoning behind my 8 point study had to do with some MISSING ELEMENTS. Things that were not there. Sometimes they are as important as the elements that are clearly seen.

I think it is CRITICAL at this point to once again point out an understanding that places me in a very very small minority. An understanding that is MISunderstood. And that is that we can know who the AntiChrist is at this moment in history.

I believe because of this misunderstanding of scripture there is no or very little chatter about his identity. I too had to ask the Lord why He told me that Emmanuel Macron is the AC. I like everyone else assumed that we can’t know now but will be revealed after the rapture. As I said, I would like to bring in one of my points that were mentioned in the study about the two witnesses. It has to do with Heb. 9:27 “Appointed Unto Men Once to Die”

Please if you will read point one. I can copy and paste it here, but I decided not to.. So here is the link. thank you for taking the time to look at it.

I have heard many many Preachers dismiss this verse and give their particular weak reasoning on why this is not a doctrinal statement. I hope, after reading and digesting what was written here, that you will see that it is definitely a doctrinal statement and to dismiss God’s Word as irrelevant because it makes no sense to us is folly.

My understanding of the word “revealed” as to when the AC will be made know is also misunderstood and makes my certainty of Emmanuel Macron’s now identity as he, is best understood by this explanation. The statement that is on the cover page of this website.

“The identity of the AntiChrist will be made known and manifested to the WORLD after the Rapture. There is no reason why we can’t know now.”

If you understand this statement and understand that the WORLD will know who he is after he signs the 7 year peace treaty with Israel. To be manifest.. to be made known, but to whom? Scripture doesn’t say that His KIDS cannot know… I know.

One more point in reference to Macron. And I mentioned this on my last post. IF MACRON IS NOT THE ANTICHRIST THAN WHY IS HE SITTING ON A THRONE NEXT TO AN EMPTY THRONE? (BTW, I emailed the writer of the article that contains this picture to see if she can add any background info to this setting.) One friend of mine thinks that he is at a news conference and is waiting to speak. Anyway…

Now, let’s talk about the missing person for the second throne in the picture. I am going to attempt to show you why that person is OBVIOUSLY not sitting there at this time. But first, once again, indulge me please and read point 8. The Transfiguration

Did you read it? Good.. Now, as I said, if the raiment of both one dead Prophet and one still living Prophet were mentioned and written about, I believe that that would have been too much information and solved the somewhat mystery of the id of the two witnesses. ( you’ll need to think about it to see what I mean.) Therefore the Lord did not include those relevant facts. He wanted to leave it as a somewhat mystery so that we can obviously study the scriptures ourselves. He does that very often as you know..

Now, look at this picture…

I believe that this is 100% accurate depiction of what will soon take place. THE TWO LEGS OF IRON, BOTH ROMAN WHO WILL SOON CHOOSE THE TEN TOES.

It’s just a little too early for the reality of this scene to take place.

The two legs of Iron (Roman), morphing into the 10 toes. But, soon after that the STRONG will subdue to weak. The AnitChrist Macron will declare himself god and completely dilute the clay.

There is certainly enough room here for disagreements. But, this is my offering.

3 comments on “The image for the 21st Century!

  1. January 7, 2020 Adrian

    Hello Bob!

    I am more inclined to believe that the second beast of Revelation – the False Prophet – will NOT be the Pope, but will be an apostate Jew who arises in the Land of Israel – possibly a head Rabbi in Israel who directs the nation to embrace the Antichrist. I lean away from the view that the Pope will be the False Prophet, though I do subscribe to the the view that the Great Harlot of Revelation 17 represents an apostate church based in Rome. So I think that’s where the Pope may come in to play – Revelation 17, perhaps the personal, highest representative of the harlot system in that day. I have several reasons for holding this position, which I won’t get into here on this reply (I can certainly further discuss by email).

    But I’ll note a couple things: 1. The contrast between the “sea” and the “earth” in Revelation 13 from where the beasts arise. Daniel 7 mentions the 4 beasts as coming up from the “great Sea”, which historically has been a phrase used to designate the Mediterranean Sea. “Sea” in Revelation 13 is the Greek “Thalassa”, which can mean “the sea” – a word used to speak of the sea generally; or specifically, the Med Sea or the Red Sea (see interlinear). Together with Daniel 7, it seems logical to understand that, whatever “sea” in Revelation 13 represents, it – at least in part – represents the Gentile world, or the domain where this beast arises (relative to Israel), and possibly specifically, the Mediterranean Sea, which of course historically relates geographically to the Roman Empire. That the second beast arises out of the “earth” may mean that the Land of Israel as the place of his rise. 2. The Second beast appears to be somewhat of a counterfeit Elijah, calling fire down from heaven. Perhaps he falsely fulfills Jewish expectations of Elijah coming. He directs the world to worship the first beast, and in this he also seems to somewhat mimic the role of John the Baptist. He may be the one who’s role it is to bring Israel in line with the Antichrist and his kingdom. Together, the first beast (a Gentile?) and the second beast (a Jew?) represent unified rebellion against God in the Tribulation hour – Gentile and Jew (i.e. all humanity) united in its rejection of God.

    I have other reasons, but I’ll leave it at this. Perhaps the Pope will be killed when the Great Harlot is destroyed, and the False Prophet will fill the void religiously, but be entirely dedicated to the first beast. I don’t insist on this dogmatically, but just some things I’ve thought about related to Revelation 13 and the two beasts.

    • January 16, 2020 Derris

      I’m in agreement with you brother/sister! I believe that the false prophet will be an apostate Jew that will arise out of the land of Israel, this is what dr David Reagan teaches at his website (Christinprophecy). The beast out of the sea (gentile)/ the beast out of the earth (Israel). God bless!

  2. January 16, 2020 Bob Wunderlich

    Well, I’m not saying that anyone is wrong. I am 100% convinced that Macron is the AC. But, I have no wisdom concerning who will be the False Prophet. So, I am open for any ideas. I lean towards the Pope because of his leadership in the Climate Change business and what he has done and will be doing with bringing all of the religions together. So, I am just glad that you all are watching.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *